Next week's Philosophy session is about Plato's cave so I've done a little research..
It seems that one of the really big
events in early Philosophy (actually of all time) is the idea of Plato's Cave,
surprisingly it remains current around 2,500 years after it's first
outing and has interpretations that include those that see it as a
call to a deity and a justification for the veneration of
philosophers.
The story is in The
Republic and is outlined here,
I will though paraphrase some of what I have found out about the
concept.
Socrates is the device
that Plato uses to narrate the story, Socrates tells Glaucon (a young follower of
Socrates and actually Plato's older brother) about a group of prisoners who are chained in a
cave and as if in a simple cinema the chained prisoners can see only
shadows of the outside world as fire casts the image on the cave
wall.
One of the prisoners
escapes and
gets out when he comes back and explains that he now knows what
really causes the shadows
The remaining prisoners end up killing the returnee because he told them that things that turn their existence upside down.
The remaining prisoners end up killing the returnee because he told them that things that turn their existence upside down.
One
interpretation of this is that it means is that people are afraid of
anything different, or perhaps even the truth.
An
analysis of the story can be that the people in the cave are
everyday people who think they are seeing real things when they are
only seeing the shadows of things. The Philosopher turns from the
senses and begins to investigate the realm of ideas. The realm of
appearance only contains opinion and error. Knowledge is only
possible in the realm of ideas. The Philosopher does not remain in
the world of ideas, but comes back to his fellow men and tries to
show them that the world of truth awaits them if they will only
listen to him and follow him.
Would such change be un-remarked on in Ancient Greece? |
No comments:
Post a Comment